Immigrants from Norway vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,258,331 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 370.9 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $47,698, a difference of 9.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $100,457, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $48,887, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $51,678, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $64,658, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $107,870, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.23%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.71%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%).