Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Chickasaw
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,749,265 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 36.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Europe | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 38.6% |
| Range | 64.1% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 18.1% |
| Median | 9.1% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |