Armenian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Armenian
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Armenians
Chickasaw
9.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,760,259 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 62.9%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 51.4% |
| Range | 12.9% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 23.7% |
| Median | 9.4% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Colombian (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), South American (9.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Peruvian (9.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Russia (9.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Armenians | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |