Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Aleuts

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Aleut Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,069,750 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to a decrease of 41.5 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Aleut Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $57,114, a difference of 9.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $91,385, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($83,446 compared to $78,682, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,241 compared to $43,998, a difference of 0.55%), median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $50,298, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $38,028, a difference of 1.8%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,210
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,702
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,446
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,241
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,168
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,719
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,377
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,370
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,052
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,708
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Exceptional
22.8%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Poor
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
15.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.9%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 56.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.3%
Poor
32.9%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Fair
6.2%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 100.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.2% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.8%), male disability (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricAleutImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.5%