South American vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,148,610 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,837 compared to $119,094, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($101,856 compared to $120,263, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $69,426, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $54,512, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $44,161, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.24%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (66.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.69%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.64%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.5%).