Serbian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Chickasaw
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,465,606 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 32.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 20.8% | 33.0% |
Range | 19.8% | 30.8% |
Mean | 9.3% | 15.0% |
Median | 8.4% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |