Pima vs Tohono O'odham Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Tohono O'odham
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Pima
Tohono O'odham
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Tohono O'odham Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,710,760 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.703 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 7.2% | 10.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.6% |
| Range | 92.8% | 64.7% |
| Mean | 29.5% | 33.2% |
| Median | 23.3% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 46.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 28.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Tohono O'odham by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (20.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 8.5%), Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 9.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 20.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |