Immigrants from Spain vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,805,190 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to an increase of 35.4 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $35,922, a difference of 41.8%), median family income ($113,815 compared to $81,852, a difference of 39.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,051 compared to $79,171, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $45,816, a difference of 16.9%), and median female earnings ($42,815 compared to $34,106, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 46.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.1%), no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 104.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 57.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.5%).