Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Married-couple Households
Iroquois Married-couple Households
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in percentage of married-couple family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of married-couple family households within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of married-couple family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Married-couple Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 98.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.3% | 90.4% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 45.4% |
| Median | 11.3% | 46.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 40.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 52.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.7% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.5% | 17.0% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Married-couple Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,068,630 | 43.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,854,287 | 43.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 581,974 | 46.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 221,781 | 44.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,752 | 43.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,437 | 51.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 53,263 | 40.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 41.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,474 | 49.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,622 | 34.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 38.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 52.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 56.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 50.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 54.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 44.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 50.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 52.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 40.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 52.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 50.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 11.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 54.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 45.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 47.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 50.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 37.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 47.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 27.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 30.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 42.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 41.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 40.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 14.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 61.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 205 | 9.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 57.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 54.3% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 100.0% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.12% | 160 | 26.2% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 15.5% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 48.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 49.7% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.31% | 59 | 100.0% |