Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Iroquois Female Poverty
15.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.69% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.9% | 95.3% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 22.4% |
| Median | 10.1% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.3% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.1% | 18.8% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,062,255 | 14.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,844,995 | 16.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 580,401 | 14.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 220,925 | 14.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,473 | 16.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,329 | 13.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 52,582 | 17.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,692 | 21.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 10,786 | 18.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,581 | 29.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 20.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,913 | 17.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 4.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 7.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 18.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 6.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 13.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 4.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 9.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 10.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 17.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 10.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 12.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 14.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 9.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 1,976 | 10.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 11.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 59.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 25.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 33.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 15.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 20.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 76.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 24.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 50.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 25.5% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 32.4% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 28.6% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 28.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |