Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Iroquois Family Poverty
10.7%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.62% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | Family Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.9% | 98.5% |
Mean | 16.3% | 15.6% |
Median | 10.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.4% | 15.9% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 202,907,470 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,823,890 | 11.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 558,336 | 10.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 212,355 | 9.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,186 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 31,817 | 9.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 51,774 | 12.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,342 | 15.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 10,662 | 11.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,291 | 28.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 1,940 | 14.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,913 | 12.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 1.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 93 | 17.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 7.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 8.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 3.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 6.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 7.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 12.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 891 | 4.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 10.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 1,744 | 6.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 8.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 1,976 | 14.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 12.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 17.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 20.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 23.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 7.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 13.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 45.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 22.8% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 12.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 13.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 22.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 19.9% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |