Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,240,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512 and weighted average of 81.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.69% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 59.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.6% | 81.7% |
Mean | 14.6% | 78.4% |
Median | 10.1% | 82.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 70.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 91.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 18.6% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,066,236 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,853,812 | 81.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 579,986 | 84.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 221,045 | 82.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,250 | 84.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,437 | 83.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 51,718 | 84.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,692 | 76.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,474 | 82.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,622 | 73.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 87.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 66.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 10,130 | 80.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 60.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 1,336 | 69.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 74.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 77.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 73.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 85.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 891 | 64.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 89.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 93.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 87.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 88.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 650 | 100.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 50.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 71.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 95.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 92.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 65.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 50.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 93.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 205 | 100.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 100.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 100.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 50.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 28.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 18.3% |