Iroquois Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Iroquois Receiving Food Stamps
13.5%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,071,964 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.757 and weighted average of 13.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.65% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Choctaw (13.6%, a difference of 0.43%), French American Indian (13.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Panama (13.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (13.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |
French American Indians | 1.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 1.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.5% |
Iroquois | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.5% |
Choctaw | 1.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants from Panama | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.6% |
Somalis | 0.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.7% |
Cajuns | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants from Somalia | 0.9 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.7% |
Cree | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.8% |
Iroquois Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.9% | 95.1% |
Mean | 18.3% | 17.9% |
Median | 10.5% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.9% | 19.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 19.4% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 202,922,064 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,838,695 | 15.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 571,827 | 14.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 220,569 | 13.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,038 | 15.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,123 | 11.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 52,759 | 13.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,939 | 21.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 10,619 | 13.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 5,293 | 21.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 19.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,913 | 18.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 4.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 735 | 13.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 11.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 7.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 18.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 8.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 15.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 8.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 12.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 891 | 12.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 9.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 11.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 9.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 14.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 16.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 7.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 28.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 22.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 7.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 18.4% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 12.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 7.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 205 | 5.9% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 28.3% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 10.3% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 12.9% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 9.0% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.31% | 59 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |