Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
19.6%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,755,154 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 19.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Guyanese (19.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Ottawa (19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.053% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 59.6% | 66.7% |
| Range | 59.6% | 62.6% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 27.9% |
| Median | 10.1% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 13.7% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 201,834,754 | 18.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,725,052 | 22.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 515,330 | 20.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 196,229 | 21.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 283,316 | 21.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 30,987 | 13.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 50,282 | 29.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 38,342 | 31.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 9,671 | 17.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 4,814 | 50.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 1,940 | 16.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,278 | 35.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 93 | 66.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 33.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 14.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 4.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 8.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 28.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.56% | 891 | 38.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.82% | 1,464 | 29.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.33% | 1,744 | 7.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 27.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 1,976 | 47.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.32% | 235 | 22.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 28.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 33.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 37.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 21.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 33.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 28.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 39.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 60.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 20.1% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 19.5% |