Iroquois vs Malaysian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Malaysian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Iroquois
Malaysians
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
41.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Malaysian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,006,670 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 46.3%, a difference of 5.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 18.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.0% |
| Range | 90.4% | 65.4% |
| Mean | 45.4% | 47.5% |
| Median | 46.1% | 46.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.2% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.1% | 52.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Mongolian (46.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants (46.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (46.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
| Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
| Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
| Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
| Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
| Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
| Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |