Jordanian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Jordanian
Select to Compare
Married-couple Households
Jordanian Married-couple Households
48.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,389,697 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 48.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.55% in percentage of married-couple family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Jordanians and percentage of married-couple family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Jordanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of married-couple family households within an area, or if Jordanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of married-couple family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Romanian (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (48.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Northern European (48.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 98.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants from North America | 98.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Laotians | 98.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 98.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 98.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Jordanian Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian Data | Married-couple Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 23.6% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 83.7% |
| Range | 18.5% | 60.1% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 51.6% |
| Median | 2.3% | 50.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 58.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 11.7% |
Correlation Details
| Jordanian Percentile | Sample Size | Married-couple Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 122,909,534 | 42.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 22,167,988 | 48.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 8,457,233 | 49.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 3,366,451 | 49.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 2,328,545 | 50.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 2,327,290 | 49.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 861,646 | 44.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 672,003 | 49.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 663,275 | 51.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 480,928 | 50.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 434,656 | 54.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 443,461 | 52.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 82,250 | 52.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 112,755 | 57.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 154,050 | 51.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 190,537 | 46.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 119,427 | 50.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 117,444 | 59.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 22,769 | 49.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 43,541 | 55.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 39,861 | 33.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 50,561 | 67.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 11,189 | 58.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 1,155 | 46.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 31,259 | 47.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 14,915 | 53.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 55,025 | 46.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 23,173 | 72.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 38,144 | 61.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 17,280 | 60.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 66.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 53.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 2,026 | 27.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 54.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 12,305 | 43.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 11,977 | 49.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 38,010 | 61.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 8,220 | 57.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 20,564 | 40.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.92% | 1,381 | 23.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 1,468 | 83.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 9,960 | 62.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 6,496 | 58.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 44.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 400 | 31.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 33.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 371 | 32.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 10,258 | 69.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 75.0% |