Immigrants from Malaysia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,061,135 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $29,031, a difference of 72.2%), median family income ($115,880 compared to $70,989, a difference of 63.2%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $59,159, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $42,380, a difference of 27.8%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $33,046, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 130.4%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 122.3%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 47.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 47.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 57.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 115.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 111.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 107.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 88.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.6%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 98.8%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.9%).