Taiwanese vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Navajo
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,849,683 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 128.1 Navajo.
Taiwanese vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $29,031, a difference of 60.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $66,529, a difference of 52.5%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $59,159, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $42,380, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $33,046, a difference of 22.8%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 148.1%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 132.7%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 130.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 42.6%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 54.2%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 21.1% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 121.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 119.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 53.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.73%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (63.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.3%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 70.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.6% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.30%), 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Taiwanese vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 66.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.7%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Navajo |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |