Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,944,450 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 17.6% |
| Range | 12.0% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 5.6% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Ukrainian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 96.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 96.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 96.4 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |