Navajo vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,533,650 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $39,827, a difference of 37.2%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $94,472, a difference of 33.1%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $78,682, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $48,749, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $38,028, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 96.8%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 93.1%), and family poverty (18.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.5%), single female poverty (31.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 107.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 56.6%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (66.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 50.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 11th grade (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.3%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.1%).