Slavic vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,660,586 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 67.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.1%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $39,827, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $91,385, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $48,749, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $38,028, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $43,998, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.1%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.52%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%).