Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,604 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to an increase of 110.9 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $48,749, a difference of 17.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $57,114, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $38,028, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,435 compared to $86,736, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $50,298, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%), single father poverty (17.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.1%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.0%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.6%).