Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,779,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $86,736, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $78,682, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $48,749, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.0%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $39,827, a difference of 7.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $50,298, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 34.3%), single father poverty (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 4.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 38.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.27%), ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%).