Jordanian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,763 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 19.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $91,385, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $78,682, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $48,749, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $38,028, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $57,114, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.4%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 59.5%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.35%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%).