Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Houma

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Tragic
Fair
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Houma Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,573,441 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 34.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Houma Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 69.2%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $57,114, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $91,385, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $50,298, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $48,749, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $86,736, a difference of 12.6%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,996
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,188
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$62,575
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,949
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,547
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$30,343
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,356
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,044
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$72,093
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,822
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
38.7%
Exceptional
22.8%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 78.7%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 62.4%), and single female poverty (33.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
24.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.2%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
12.9%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 65.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.4%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.5%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (45.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.5%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
46.6%
Poor
32.9%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
6.2%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.8%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 78.1%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
75.0%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
47.6%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
41.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
0.96%
Poor
1.7%

Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.2%).
Houma vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricHoumaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
17.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
9.1%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.3%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.5%