Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,440,871 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 62.3 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $56,584, a difference of 51.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $120,333, a difference of 41.5%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $67,698, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 8.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $57,075, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $68,495, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.6%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.5%), family households (67.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.9%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 50.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 92.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 83.7%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.3%).