Mexican American Indian vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,238,565 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 89.8 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($37,407 compared to $38,560, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($35,629 compared to $36,492, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $85,144, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $90,951, a difference of 0.15%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $91,087, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 0.37%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 4.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.43 compared to 3.41, a difference of 0.44%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.8%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.23%), ged/equivalency (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%).