Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
Chickasaw
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,719,504 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 22.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 35.7% |
| Range | 94.2% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 16.2% |
| Median | 12.7% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |