Immigrants from Argentina vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,995,158 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $51,678, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($49,627 compared to $47,698, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,873 compared to $110,635, a difference of 0.21%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $107,870, a difference of 0.37%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,415 compared to $100,457, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in currently married (47.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.0%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.18%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.78%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).