Immigrants from Argentina vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,950,660 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.408% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 408.1 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $31,729, a difference of 56.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $74,257, a difference of 45.8%), and median household income ($92,417 compared to $63,681, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $47,012, a difference of 15.3%), median female earnings ($41,554 compared to $35,266, a difference of 17.8%), and median earnings ($49,841 compared to $38,707, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 101.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 95.5%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 16.7%), receiving food stamps (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 258.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 219.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 216.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 62.1%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 86.4%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 68.9%), and bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 56.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).