Houma vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,397,425 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 28.2 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 102.8%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $42,434, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($30,343 compared to $35,266, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($76,188 compared to $76,605, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $38,707, a difference of 0.62%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $63,681, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 49.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 253.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 199.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 144.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.82, a difference of 20.3%), and births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.9%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 99.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 13.2%).