Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Crow
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,816,616 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 68.7 Crow.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $31,729, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($75,123 compared to $63,681, a difference of 18.0%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $35,266, a difference of 0.50%), median earnings ($40,851 compared to $38,707, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $42,434, a difference of 9.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 82.3%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 69.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 204.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 199.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 196.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 78.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.82, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 40.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 118.2%), bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Crow |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |