Immigrants from Peru vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,826,908 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to a decrease of 9.7 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,010 compared to $63,681, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $74,257, a difference of 38.9%), and per capita income ($43,852 compared to $31,729, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $35,266, a difference of 13.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $47,012, a difference of 19.9%), and median earnings ($47,025 compared to $38,707, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 101.5%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 97.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 96.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 232.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 214.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 213.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.5%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.4%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.34%), ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and high school diploma (87.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).