Immigrants from Latin America vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,833,738 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.5%), median household income ($75,420 compared to $63,681, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $74,257, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $35,266, a difference of 0.11%), median earnings ($41,049 compared to $38,707, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $49,234, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 84.8%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 72.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 201.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 199.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 198.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.82, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 100.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.82%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%).