Italian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Italian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Italians
Chickasaw
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,452,488 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.66%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 42.4% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.6% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 71.7% | 67.1% |
| Median | 69.1% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.2% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Italians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |