Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Jordanian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,422,649 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 80.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.48% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Jordanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Jordanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), German Russian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Colombian (80.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Immigrants from Romania | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Asians | 97.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 80.2% |
Immigrants from Croatia | 97.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 80.1% |
German Russians | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Immigrants from Japan | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Colombians | 97.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Jordanians | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 97.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Croatians | 97.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Chileans | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Immigrants from Venezuela | 96.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Poles | 96.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Uruguayans | 96.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Ghanaians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 71.6% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 92.1% |
Range | 18.5% | 20.5% |
Mean | 3.1% | 80.7% |
Median | 2.2% | 80.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 77.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 82.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
Correlation Details
Jordanian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 122,913,844 | 79.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 22,185,516 | 80.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 8,457,233 | 80.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 3,368,429 | 80.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 2,332,544 | 80.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 2,330,249 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 861,646 | 79.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 672,003 | 80.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 665,415 | 80.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 480,928 | 77.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 434,656 | 82.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 443,461 | 79.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 82,250 | 80.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 112,755 | 78.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 154,050 | 80.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 190,537 | 80.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 119,427 | 71.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 117,444 | 85.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 22,769 | 79.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 43,541 | 79.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 39,861 | 79.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 50,561 | 85.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 11,189 | 77.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 1,155 | 77.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 31,259 | 76.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 14,915 | 81.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 55,025 | 81.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 23,173 | 77.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 38,144 | 76.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 17,280 | 80.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 90.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 85.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 3,532 | 91.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 84.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 12,305 | 75.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 11,977 | 75.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 38,010 | 79.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 8,220 | 73.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 20,564 | 75.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.92% | 1,381 | 85.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 9,960 | 79.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 6,496 | 74.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 84.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 400 | 92.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 73.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 371 | 91.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 10,258 | 80.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 90.0% |