Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,853,267 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 20.8 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $91,624, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $52,365, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($77,559 compared to $83,395, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $57,919, a difference of 0.79%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $39,870, a difference of 0.86%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $38,528, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.5%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (43.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.98%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.9%).