Crow vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,446,990 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,681 compared to $83,395, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $96,834, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $91,624, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,528, a difference of 9.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,365, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $44,825, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 98.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 77.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 240.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 233.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 210.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.7%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 104.1%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.4%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.2%).