Immigrants from Latin America vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,677,299 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $97,288, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $91,624, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $96,834, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.25%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.9%), and per capita income ($36,823 compared to $39,870, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.5%), master's degree (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%).