Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,997,317 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 42.9 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 23.0%), median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $38,528, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $96,834, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $52,365, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $51,473, a difference of 0.19%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $44,825, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.96%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 161.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 87.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 18.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.0%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.50%), ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.0%).