Immigrants from Malaysia vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,276,614 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $39,870, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $51,473, a difference of 20.7%), and median family income ($115,880 compared to $97,288, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $52,365, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $57,919, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.23%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.8%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.0%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.3%).