Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Average Family Size
COMPARE
Iroquois
White/Caucasian
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Iroquois
Whites/Caucasians
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.14
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs White/Caucasian Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 3.16. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,525,704 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.923 and weighted average of 3.14, a difference of 0.44%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.73 | 2.96 |
Maximum | 4.68 | 4.26 |
Range | 2.95 | 1.30 |
Mean | 3.07 | 3.32 |
Median | 3.10 | 3.33 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.82 | 3.09 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.34 | 3.52 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.52 | 0.43 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.50 | 0.25 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.50 | 0.25 |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Whites/Caucasians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Greece (3.16, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Singapore (3.16, a difference of 0.050%), Tlingit-Haida (3.16, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Germany (3.15, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Immigrants from France (3.15, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Netherlands (3.14, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (3.15, a difference of 0.070%), Yugoslavian (3.15, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Denmark (3.15, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 |
Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 |
Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 |
New Zealanders | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.15 |
Cambodians | 0.6 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.15 |
Swiss | 0.5 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.15 |
Okinawans | 0.5 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.5 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | England | 0.4 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 0.4 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.15 |
Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.15 |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | France | 0.4 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.15 |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.3 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.14 |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 0.3 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.14 |