Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,076,604 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 169.3 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $41,485, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $60,096, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,997 compared to $44,509, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $97,373, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,574, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (63.9% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.6%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%).