Immigrants from Uruguay vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,100,381 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.776. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.610% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 1,610.1 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $38,560, a difference of 14.1%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $48,093, a difference of 9.9%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $42,280, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,626, a difference of 0.62%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $56,321, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $78,803, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.51%).