Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,189,303 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 49.6 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $109,941, a difference of 14.4%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $111,689, a difference of 13.7%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $93,700, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $54,239, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $47,361, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.35%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.33%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%).