Immigrants from Uruguay vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,871,011 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.336% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 335.7 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $64,658, a difference of 13.5%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $110,635, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $51,678, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $40,491, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $48,887, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 35.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.75%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.90%).