Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,711,717 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $119,094, a difference of 23.9%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $120,263, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $69,426, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $54,512, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $44,161, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.29%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.22%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.94%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%).