Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Bolivia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,135,214 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.330% in Immigrants from Bolivia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 329.6 Immigrants from Bolivia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $73,434, a difference of 28.9%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $101,394, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $117,731, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $48,970, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,467, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.2%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and 8th grade (94.8% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Bolivia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%).