Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Serbia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,194,398 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Serbia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 15.4 Immigrants from Serbia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($98,205 compared to $113,463, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $50,810, a difference of 15.5%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $60,600, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $53,321, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $91,730, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.6%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.17%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.9% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Serbia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%).