Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,915,649 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 49.5 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $54,866, a difference of 24.7%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $120,726, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $69,343, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $53,528, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,996, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.6%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.1%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.23%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 83.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%).